This spike in radiation was detected on the 8th January 2012, on the Sunshine Coast, Australia. The wind direction was NNE at 22degrees. Geiger Counter Alarm starting going off at around 6.30 pm. Raised radiation levels lasted until around 9.45 pm.

The Gammascout Geiger Counter alert alarm was set to go off at .50 uS/Hr, and to record data every 10 minutes. I was shocked  to hear the Geiger alarm going off. Visual observations showed actual peaks reaching  .80 uS/Hr.  Even though this chart  of the downloaded 10 minute interval recorded data is not showing the true peaks that occurred, it is still dramatic.

 If the maximum visual observed peak had been recorded, the peak on this chart would be over twice as high!

The beginning of the chart   would be considered average background for our area. Background radiation levels here, with 4 years of recorded data to refer to, has averaged around .10 uS/Hr. The background radiation level was peaking 8 times above average during this event!

Either some of the radioactive fall out from Fukushima has briefly reached us, or there is some seismic activity N/NE of our location in the Pacific Ocean which has released a spike in radon gas. Just a theory.

The dramatic drop in background reading just before the spike is also interesting. Anyone have any ideas?

I promised members that I would post any unusual radiation data, I just didn't expect to be doing this so soon.

Here is an article at The Sunshine Coast Daily, the local paper on this event, plus an interview on New Zealand radio station GreenplanetFM. Click the play button next to the speaker icon, to listen to the radio interview, that starts after a bit of an introduction on synchronicity.

I have since had a report from someone in New Zealand. He detected .33 uS/Hr. He had wiped down a small area of a wet car, and then tested the cloth. He indicated that this was above their normal background level. This was  2 days after my report.

"Hello Peter!

I carried out a swab of a car windscreen after our first rain in weeks. I've been doing this every so often out of curiosity after seeing many videos on youtube showing results.Well, after 4-5 weeks of northerlies, and no serious rain (as well as stinking hot weather) a quick swab test of 0.4m^2 of windscreen yielded 0.33 microSieverts per hour … outside background here averages 0.12 microSieverts per hour …

Using the front foil, it appeared to be alphas and betas …
What ever you were detecting blew this way, and precipitated in the rain.

I'm in Dunedin NZ. Almost 46 South

Best Regards and Wishes,"

Here are four theories on what caused the spike in radiation.

Theory One

My theory is that there was an event at Fukushima around late December 2011 – new years 2012 that released a large amount of radiation. The weather conditions where similar to those of March / April 2011. The (NILU), Norwegian Institute for Air Research had run  simulations which predicted the creation of world wide radiation fallout clouds from the Fukushima nuclear disaster for March / April 2011. One of these simulations for March / April 2011 indicated that a radiation cloud would form off the east coast of Australia. This year the cloud formed again but blew inland, and didn't stay off the coast.

Here is the NILU map of the March /April 2011 radiation cloud off Australia's east coast.

See all the Fukushima radiation cloud simulation maps  for  2011 by NILU here.

http://globalcooperative.wordpress.com/2011/05/18/radiation-map-analysis-europe-australasia/

TheoryTwo

Potrblog have gone to a lot of trouble, and put a detailed youtube video analysis of the Caloundra radiation spike event on the Internet. These people have done similar analyses of American radiation fallout events. This is their theory.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=C5wGLK06kZg

Theory Three

Paul Langley

http://nuclearhistory.wordpress.com/2012/01/21/arpansa-responds-to-a-citizens-detection-of-a-radiation-spike-in-queensland-january-2012/

Theory Four

HAARP and how Fukushima radiation beamed down to Australia, by Yoichi Shimatsu, former General Editor – The Japan Times Weekly

http://rense.com/general95/haarp1.html

Here are new background radiation level charts that show raised radiation levels for January 25th, 27th and February 25th 2012.

This week starting January 23/01/2012, we have had over 300 mm of rain. Rain troughs have been coming from the Australian northern tropics constantly for days now. It would appear that our average daily background radiation is increasing since the spike event on the 8 January 2012, (see chart above).

I am now recording local background radiation every minute, so I am more likely to record those spikes. You will notice that the dark blue radiation average for 24 hours line in the new charts has crept up above .15 uS/Hr to .18 uS/Hr over the two days. Radiation spikes are now going above .3 uS/Hr, plus background readings are much more volatile.  Up until the  8th January 2012, I have not seen spikes go above .2 uS/Hr at my location. These charts represents the highest average so far for the 4 years of data I have collected on local background radiation levels. Our average local background  over four years has been around .10 uS/Hr!

Another radioactive cloud passes over on the 25 February 2012, 24 hour chart – one minute sampling.

The highest recorded peak was .34 uS/Hr at 7.33 am. More spikes of .30 uS/Hr between 7am to 8am in the morning. Dark blue line in the 24 hour chart is the daily average, .146 uS/Hr. This all happened at the end of a significant local rain event. Some local areas received 340 mm of rain in 24 hours.

I looked at the local weather radar at the time and the rain event came in off the ocean from the north north east. The same direction as the radiation cloud that I detected passing over the east coast of Australia on January 8th 2012.

Another radioactive cloud passes over on the 5th March 2012, 24 hour chart – one minute sampling.

The highest  peak was a visual observation of .63 uS/Hr after the Geiger alarm went of,  lots more spikes of .30 uS/Hr  and above falling off in the late afternoon . Dark blue line in the 24 hour chart is the daily average, .185 uS/Hr. This all happened during a significant local rain event.

I looked at the local weather radar at the time and the rain event came in off the Pacific Ocean in a strange spiral pattern from the north.

Radioactive cloud detections on the 20th and 21st of April

So far. all our radioactive cloud detections have occurred when the wind has come from the northern tropics. From my observations of the weather radar at the time, on the 20th and 21st, two air masses, a northerly and southerly, meet just north of Caloundra. The Geiger Counter alarm sounded on numerous occasions, indicating radiation levels went above .50 uSv/hr multiple times. These above .50 uSv/hr events where brief and were not recorded by the Geiger Counter data logger. My theory is that when the northerly pressure system pushed a little bit south, we got the radiation detections. When the northerly air mass was pushed north background went back to normal. The radioactive cloud detections are a result of the huge amounts of radiation released by the still active Fukushima Nuclear disaster, breaching the Northern and Southern hemisphere air circulation barrier.

Radioactive cloud detections on the 23rd of April

Here is the chart for the 23rd, peaks not as high as the 20th and 21st April, but the days overall average radiation level was higher.

Other related articles on radiation from Fukushima

Nuclear Power Technology, an extinction level event.

http://sccc.org.au/archives/2186

Fukushima and safe radiation levels

http://sccc.org.au/archives/428

Radiation Cloud detected over South Island of New Zealand 29th January 2012

http://sccc.org.au/archives/2517

Radiation Cloud detected over Melbourne Australia 26th February 2012

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q74OAsV2yPU

Previous generations had the view that it was a scientific fact it was impossible to fly, or to have large metal ships that float, or travel under water. New, previously impossible technologies and possibilities are created, as new information and discoveries are added to the human collective intellectual database.

We are constantly told about new scientific discoveries. But what are scientific discoveries? Nothing more than what was already possible in the world, but humans where not aware of it. So if that is the case, doesn't this show that what we consider as fact can be changed in an instant with new information? It is always important to keep an open mind, and a view that anything may be possible.

You have all been taught that the Earth and the planets revolve around the Sun in elliptical orbits. That is true if you think of the Sun as stationary. The Sun is actually moving around the centre of our Milky Way Galaxy at 220km/sec, a phenomenal speed. That the means that the planets are actually traveling in a spiral through space, if you take into account the 220KM/sec motion of the Sun. You can look up this information about our Sun here, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun Just taking into consideration an object as huge as the Sun's size and mass, traveling at 220Km/sec, plus our tiny planet is following it while spinning around, it's just incredible!

This means that our set perspective of what we considered factual and possible, about the motion of the planets and the Sun, has just changed in an instant with new information.

Is it possible that someone now has the technology to artificially create earthquakes? There seems to be evidence that this is the case. I keep an eye on earthquake activity throughout the world on a daily bases. Looking at the grid pattern of small earthquakes in the screen shot below. This is definitely unnatural. Each dot represents the epicentre of an earthquake over a week or less, showing up in Turkey, on the European Earthquake monitoring system in May 2011.

I use these sites for real time earthquake activity monitoring, “Latest Earthquakes in the World – Past 7 days”

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/

and “The European and Mediterranean Seismological Centre”

http://www.emsc-csem.org/Earthquake/Map/gmap.php

The first thing you find out when you use these facilities, is that they don't show you all the worldwide earthquake activity on any of these sites. You need to be looking at both sites to get a better world view of earthquake activity.

To get to the main point, look at this youtube video below. This was put up on youtube on May 22, 2011. I don't necessarily agree with all the views in this video. I am mainly interested in the earthquake grid pattern they discovered.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WqOFHc7CRhE&feature=player_embedded

Then read this article at the Colin Andrew's site.

http://www.colinandrews.net/EarthquakeGridPattern-Colin_Andrews.html

The images at the Colin Andrew's frame grabs, are of the Canary Island swarm of earthquakes just before the Volcano El Hierro submarine volcano erupted recently. The screen shot was taken from the official European-Mediterranean Seismological Centre website on October 8, 2011.

I was at the European-Mediterranean Seismological Centre website and viewed the Canary Island earthquake activity myself in real time, and found a similar, but smaller active grid pattern of earthquake activity on the northern ocean side of the island, on the 21th and 22th of November, around the El Hierro Volcano vent that is erupting below the sea.

Here is information about the Canary Island El Hierro Volcano eruption that started recently.

http://www.volcanodiscovery.com/volcano_news.html

This evidence would suggest that there are artificial earthquake experiments taking place for the creation, or control of earthquakes, or volcanoes in this case. You just do not get epicentres of earthquakes happening on perfect grid patterns, they are random. I have been looking at earthquakes for years and have never seen patterns of this type ever, until now.

So far, different observers have seen these earthquake grid patterns at different times. They have been small earthquakes in magnitude at present. They have also shown up in real time on the earthquake monitoring systems in different locations. The El Hierro grid pattern earthquakes I observed, all had the same depth of around 20Km and were approximately around the same magnitude of between 2.7 to 3. This is also very unnatural.

The earthquake activity at the Canary islands is a big deal because of the potential disaster it could create! If you look up HAARP or scalar technologies on the Internet, you will find lots of information and patents that have been granted for these types of technologies. A very quick summary on the theory of how these HAARP technologies work. They use powerful giga watt directed energy beams, generated from ground stations or satellites, and reflect this energy beam off plasma mirrors they have strategically created in the Earth's Ionosphere. This allows them to accurately focus that beam to different locations around the world to affect the weather, or create earthquakes. Lots of countries, including the major powers, have facilities to experiment with these technologies. These recent earthquake grid observations suggest that someone is refining their technology to be more focused, accurate, and effective.

Are these earthquake grid patterns proof someone is experimenting and refining this type of technology?

Update 19th April 2012,

I took these screen shots below of seismic activity in Turkey 18.04.2012. 

No way this is natural, earthquake activity is random. These earthquake grids when they appear consist of lots of small earthquakes around 2 to 3 on the Richter scale all around the same depth. These small grid earthquake patterns can last for days.

They tend to try and hide this activity by clustering a lot of small earthquakes in a relativity small area. Unless you focus in on this cluster activity and magnify it, you would not notice it.

This activity has been quite for some time but I detected this yesterday on the European Mediterranean Seismological Centre ( http://www.emsc-csem.org/Earthquake/Map/gmap.php ) web site and took these screen shots.

http://sccc.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/capture_001_18042012_143310.jpg

http://sccc.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/capture_001_18042012_143521.jpg

These earthquake patterns can last for days in one place. Is it like pushing softly on the plate to see what will happen, or is it to try and relieve plate pressure?
Or is it "Look what we can do," cooperate or else?
The other question is who is doing it?

Feel free to distribute this article.
© Peter Daley 2011