• Join
  • Meeting Times and Locations
    • Caloundra Technology Education Centre
    • Buderim Technology Education Centre
  • Contact Us
  • Q and A
  • Free Resourses
    • Security Basics
    • WiFi Safety Guide
    • Open Office Tutorials
    • Apple Tutorials
    • Stress Management
    • The Gimp Tutorial Videos
    • Members Website Design Group
  • Interests Supported
    • Linux Operating Systems
    • Apple Mac Operating Systems
    • DIY Website Design and Marketing
    • Graphics & Digital Image Manipulation (Including Slide Shows)
  • Articles
    • Newest Articles
    • Article Index
    • Magazine Bits’N’Bytes Library
    • Health and Environmental Effects of Technology
    • Computer Security
    • Open Office
    • Audio and Sound
    • Linux
    • Buying and Selling on Ebay
    • Web Artist, Basic Web Page Creation
    • The Food Lab
    • Daily Local Background Radiation Levels and Advisories
  • Members Websites

Accidental, and surprising detection of radioactivity in lead solder! (Preliminary Report)

 by Peter Daley

I was sent this email from a person informing me about an accidental and surprising detection of radioactivity in lead solder that this person had purchased in Australia.

 

—————————–

 

Email 18th October 2013,

 

“Had my roll of electrical solder come close to my SBT 10, and started getting counts – Bloody great – tested it with my LND 7317 and averaged ~400cpm. Im doing a few more tests with sheet of paper, etc and will send a chart with results and maybe send a sample of the solder to Peter to try and see what the . is going on. Perhaps dirty lead?…”

 

—————————–

 

I received the first 12 gram sample late on the 30th of October, and started testing immediately. It took a while to complete multiple tests, plus do research on the test results. In my opinion the sample tests showed the lead solder to be significantly radioactive.

 

On the 8th November I contacted the company that had sold this brand of solder roll here in Australia. I spoke to the Australian product manager. I did this to inform the company of the detection, plus to provide the company with the opportunity to do further investigations into how wide spread and significant this contamination was. The product manager requested a sample for further assessment and testing, which I posted to him on the afternoon of the 8th of November 2013.

 

Later that afternoon a more senior representative phoned me, and freely volunteered the information that this solder was manufactured in China from recycled electronic circuit boards. They had been dealing with this Chinese supplier for over twenty years, and had not had any problems with this product before.

 

They said they would be transparent in their dealings with this detection, and provide feedback. I was sent a replacement roll of solder with a different product name, and it tested clean.

 

I phoned product manager on the 26th of November and was informed they were still waiting on the test results. When I heard nothing back from them, I rang on the 2nd of December 2013 to find out if the test results had been received yet. I spoke to the project manager again. He conveyed to me,

 

1. The test results had not been received yet.

 

2. The information conveyed to him, by the scientist doing the testing was it was mainly radioactive lead that was detected. He pointed out there was radioactive lead all around us in the environment, and in all lead. So it was unlikely that this contamination detection would be an issue.

 

In our discussion I pointed out that three contaminated rolls had now been detected in Australia by different people. (four now) In my opinion, the amount of radioactive contamination was significant, and way above what you would normally find in normal lead solder products.

 

Here is a Geiger counter test of 250 grams of a different brand of lead solder. This is solder roll sent as a replacement for the contaminated roll. As you can see from the test chart, it is at background level. This is how lead solder you purchase should test!

(Click on image to see larger version)

Normal solder

 

Now compare that test to the test of 64 grams of lead solder, taken off the contaminated roll.

(Click on image to see larger version)

Lead solder 64 grams 141113

 

 

There is a very large and obvious difference between the test results of normal solder, and the contaminated roll. Here is a more scientific long average Geiger counter tested conducted in the same background environment, for comparison.

(Click on image to see larger version)

Contaminated lead solder compared to normal solder 041213

 

 

I now have lots of reports from people who have tested a broad range of solder brands. So far, the contaminated detections are restricted to four rolls of this brand purchased in Australia. A contact in New Zealand has reported a clean test for newly purchased solder, including the brand in question.

 

Email Report: ( I have removed the company and product information from this email )

 

—————————————–

 

Hi Peter,

 

I popped into the branch in Wellington yesterday and bought a 200g roll. I also bought small samples of the 1.0mm version and their lead-less solder.

 

I then wandered up to the university and found a professor who works on such things. He placed the samples in front of his handy survey meter. There was no sign of radioactivity above the existing background.

 

This morning I’ve put them in front of my scintillator. Readings decreased by about 10%, perhaps due to the shielding effect of the lead.

 

All the best,

 

———————————————–

 

This evidence now suggests the contaminated solder is restricted to a batch sold in Australia. This is not conclusive. Unfortunately there does not appear to be any batch information provided on the product labeling.

 

My opinion

 

The radioactive contaminated lead solder could present a health risk under these circumstances.

 

1. If you didn’t wash your hands well after use, or touched other objects before washing your hands. Yes, I know, you should do this even if it was just plain lead solder.

 

2. Lead X-ray fluorescence, plus the significant amount Beta radiation released, could also be an issue if enough of it was in close proximity, eg. a wearable electronic device, or stored in large amounts.

 

3. Adults and children potentially breathing in volatilized contaminants on melting when soldering.

 

My big concern is children using this contaminated solder, when working on hobby electronics projects. Their greater potential for hand to mouth contact, and breathing in volatilized contaminants.

 

I have no idea how widely this contaminated lead may have been distributed. Has it been used in the manufacture of other electronic devices, or products that use lead? More investigation is needed to establish if this is the case. If you were building a Geiger counter kit or scintillator equipment using this solder, it would contaminate your project. At present, I would suggest anyone who uses lead solder for electronic projects to test it before use.

 

From the information conveyed to me at present, the company’s interpretation of the hazard appears to be different from mine.

 

At this point I and others have contacted the relevant Government regulators in both Australia and New Zealand. Health and safety complaint forms have been submitted to inform the authorities of the detections. We will have to wait and see what the outcomes are from this process. I will submit a more detail report once this process is complete.

 

The major issue here is Nuclear waste getting into the manufacturing process through poor control, regulation, and corruption. That everyone is a victim when this happens, manufacturer, distributor and consumer, plus the environment. These consumer goods will end up in land fills!

 

Test before use, would be the wisest action at present.

 

More Detailed Test Results

 

Because the first sample sent to me was sent to the manufacturer for further analysis, my contact sent me a larger 64 gram sample for further testing.

 

A Theremino Geiger counter Kit, + Russian SBT-10 pancake tube, was used for Geiger counter testing. The solder sample was in a zip locked plastic bag during testing. The lead in the solder would offer some self shielding.

 

This sample was from the original 200 gram solder roll. The Geiger counter testing of this lead solder detected mostly beta, a significant Alpha presence, plus a small amount of Gamma.

 

Gamma + Beta test result

 

1.6 uSv/hr
1000cpm

 

Geiger counter test chart shows that there was very little Gamma radiation detected, when an Aluminum Beta shield was in place.

(Click on image to see larger version)

Lead solder 64 grams 141113

 

 

This Alpha test was done by another person with different equipment. Alpha test chart of the solder using a LND 7317 pancake probe. Unshielded 532cpm, with a piece of paper between solder sample and probe 332cpm. So approximately 200 cpm was Alpha Radiation 532 – 332.

(Click on image to see larger version)

lead solder with paper between sample and probe 532 cpm to 332 cpm

 

 

The main peaks in the scintillator testing appear to be for radioactive Lead Pb-210 at 46 keV and Lead X-ray fluorescence. The “Americium Am-241 ?” maker in this chart is not confirmed, and has a considerable amount of uncertainty associated with it. We will have to wait for the company’s final report.

 

Here is a MCA Theremino software chart of a 64 gram sample of the lead solder.

(Click on image to see larger version)

Lead solder 64 grams 221113 TV51 23c 45144

 

 

The best suggestion at present for the peak around 21 keV, is the X-ray fluorescence of another metal in the solder, eg., Rhodium, Palladium or Silver.

 

For further information and technical discussion on the radioactive lead solder detection, go to this Gamma Spectacular forum.

 

http://www.gammaspectacular.com/index.php?route=forum/post&path=540

 

Disclaimer: This is an amateur volunteer run service. Human error can provide incorrect information, and equipment malfunction can produce false readings. Do not rely on, or take action upon information presented on this web site, without further research. Views expressed in the pages or images on the SCCC Inc., site maybe the personal opinions of the relevant writers, and are not necessarily representative of those of SCCC Inc.

 

Sunshine Coast Computer Club
Copyright © 2021 All Rights Reserved
Website Design by Website Design Centre
Powered by WordPress